WHY I STILL WATCH GIRLS

I MAY BE AN ANTI-FEMINIST, BUT I STILL WATCH GIRLS. There’s a grotesque aspect to GIRLS from the beginning. The sex is awkward, Lena Dunham is insanely gross naked, and every character has destructive relationships. I watch the show to see the gay character Elijah. He walks into a room. Usually without pants. A shirt too small. Hannah may be scratching her latest STD or spiralling after a pregnancy, he is there to reassure her and patronise. He cares, but he also makes fun of how dumb these young bitches are: ‘Come come, put your little head on my lap. Come my little girl. I’m patting you with my pizza hand. Adding more grease to the situation.’ Elijah is the sense of reason and deep humour, a reality point, in a swamp of hormonal young women falling downwards into womanhood and the mocking laughter of the gay man makes it worth it.

Clementine’s Man Hating Mob Hounds Autistic Man

GUESS WHO’S BACK for October 2016? Clementine Ford. Writing an article for the Sydney Morning Herald about Polish women that fought for reproductive rights. The Fairfax columnist proposed the following:

If we were to fight back in this fashion, as a union of women demanding the rights that belong to us, it might not just be the people in charge who realise just how strong we can be. Maybe, just maybe, we might realise it too.

Before writing this stirring article, Miss Clementine bolsters another feminist mob. Women had reported on a man ruthlessly attacking women on a confined tram in Melbourne, Australia. Ford retweeted and re-posted the story about harassment – feel free to read the post below. The Daily Mail reported by the 10th of October, this Facebook post attracted 80,000 likes and 10,000 shares in a matter of hours. The man was publicly shamed for being a ‘festering turd of a human being’ that ‘intimidated multiple young Asian women’:

The story focused on the racism and sexism invading women’s personal space and explored the inner struggle confronting their monster. In the image below you can see him “man-spreading” as he smiles after his misogynistic mauling. Twitter user @GodfreyElfwick archived Miss Ford’s anger towards the man as she mentioned the title of her latest book. Now on sale at Readings booksellers. As a member of the press and social activist, moved women to pour out their emotions about mistreatment in the public sphere.

Turns out there’s not a shred of journalism to this story.

The truth was this man was ‘reportedly autistic’ and he loved to high-five strangers. Rather than call the police these women posted these images on Facebook to shame this well-loved disabled man. The police could have helped this person navigate this encounter and reassure these women of his condition. Clementine gave the public an opportunity to express countless death threats and verbal assaults on this man known for his kindness throughout the city.

What did Clementine do as a member of the press, as a journalist for the Sydney Morning Herald, and self-proclaimed champion of human rights? Not only was she behind reposting and pouring hatred on this man she failed to apologise for her actions. Tim Blair from The Daily Telegraph shows her inability to apologise:

The popular author has since been criticised and mocked, but Clementine isn’t backing down. Here’s her response: “That man is not autistic.” Maybe he isn’t, Clementine. Maybe he’s just one of those fakers who only identifies as autistic.

After the truth came to light, she refuses the truth of his condition, the interviews, and do the job of a journalist. Any journalist worth their salt would write a retraction. What is worse than avoiding truth is being a conduit for misandry, feminist anger, and deaths threats towards an innocent man. Despite this refusal and avoiding responsibility she proceeded to delete her comments and criticism according to @AceMainly:

You see Clementine Ford has this image to uphold. It’s a two faced image: in her job as a journalist for Fairfax and writer and speaker, she reports on the victimisation of women. But online with Twitter, Facebook, and her podcast The Misandry Hour, she is a self-proclaimed man-hater that draws in misogynistic hate. Then uses this hate in this sphere to make money in her professional sphere. In one case she hounded the employer of an online troll to get him fired and lose his income and reputation. In this case she used her notoriety to bring death threats to an autistic man that loved to ride the trams. Revolting.

Filthy Frank: Hierarchy, Character and Theories

Filthy Frank Summary

Most of the ideas are originally from Filthy Frank on DizastaMusic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/DizastaMusic and later on the second channel on TVFilthyFrank:
https://www.youtube.com/user/TVFilthyFrank/featured. Mostly characters were created by George Kusunoki-Miller, Australian-Japanese YouTuber living in New York and Japan. 

Summary of Hierarchy

1. The main malevolent deity Lord Chin Chin
2. Filthy Frank travels between realms and souls visit him through his closet
3. Sub-deities are his friends in lycra for their sexual perversions
4. Entities are let into the apartment to fight sub-deities. 
5. These disembodied spirits fight Lord Frank but are afraid of higher gods like Chin Chin or the Peace or War God. 

Characters:

Pink Guy:

We see that Pink Guy cannot sing, talk, but screams. He can eloquently communicate through rap. Maybe he cannot rap but he hears things differently, often cannot sing contemporary songs and lashed out by breaking plates and cups. The reason Pink Guy humps the air and Salamander masturbates is the Evil Narrator that controls everything.  Even as he warns people on the street about the dark Lord. Pink guy is gay and at times with the Red Power Ranger. Doesn’t live with Frank. Pink Guy can summon Saint Nicholas to defeat his enemies. Pink guy is ultimately tormented (like the writer who suffers from epilepsy).

Chin Chin

A God. A malevolent farting Lord. When he arrives he bring farts. In CHIN CHIN (A SERIOUS VIDEO) we get the first description of the dark Lord or Chin Chin is coming. Frank says he has been gone for 6,000 Chromosomes where it now means time as prophesied by  Safari Man. The call is “I LOVE CHIN CHIN” summons him. Frank wants Safari Man to kill him, but he is a coward. One direction are his servants, hate crimes are sacrifices and Chin Chin requires sacrifices and every day. Although Frank can ask these souls to turn on Chin Chin. As a sacrifice he must take Salamander Man and draws him into the closet. He cannot be stopped according to Safari Man. Even Chin Chin says he loves Chin Chin.  

Filthy Frank

Lives in a filthy apartment. Frank does not live with Pink Guy who only comes in to masturbate, he does commit race crimes, and a fan of One Direction. Frank has a propensity for black women, even called a nigga by a black woman, and often kills black people. There are some inconsistencies with Frank’s sexuality: Frank at other times is a woman, can menstruate and masturbates to boy bands. In contrast to Frank also having thousands of children, in a sock, under his bed. Harasses followers of Harry Styles in Twitter. Classic troll. He can communicate between realms and summon Pink Guy back to his realm. Filthy Frank under Japanese Mask shows that he can travel between the realms in 8000CH and may not be aware of this in 2000 CH AD. The future “The legendary Fanku-sama.” 

Filthy Frank Imposter

Filthy Frank original is seen wearing clear glasses and Filthy Frank Imposter has children wrap around sunglasses and sometimes a Japanese bomber helmet. 

Red Dick

A dancing deity. A friend to Frank. A spirit guide in Japan and in New York and in Kenya. They often terrorise people. Usually he is running around with Pink Guy. But when Red Dick takes Filthy Frank to Japan he just insults him and people at the arcades. Turns out Red Dick is a gourmet chef.   

Salamander Man

Salamander Man is a messenger, a prophet, can bring warning of dangers: like hipsterism. Salamander’s habitat is also in the hallway. He masturbated under Franks bed. Taken by Chin Chin in 2000 chromosomes AD. His worth is based on being able to play the ass flute. Despite Frank’s followers making sacrifices, he himself failed to make one. Only after playing for the Dark Lord did he let him go at the Rock, Paper, Scissor Arena. He may have also know Frank’s mother personally. An overly sexual deity, that has sensitive nipples. He also refers to Frank as his Lord, so Frank is a higher deity. Plays flute through his nose and really well through his ass. Chin chin takes Salamander Man and defeats Lemon man.

Lemon Man

Attempts to fight Chin Chin but only pathetically throws lemons and squashes and drops lemon juice. Lemons come from his nipples and he cannot throw them very far. 

Alien

Another deity. Most sub-deities are in full body lycra to show the perverse sexual nature of these beings. The alien comes back in a bacchanalia episode where they get high with the doll version and has sex. 

Simon Cowell

Simon Cowell is a Lord. Claims One Direction are his followers and under his command. 13 years old are the future. Wants to start an army of 13 year olds, create chaos and control the world. 

 Plastic Pinocchio

Chin Chin’s henchman, even realises how powerful Frank is and sounds like David Attenborough. 

Santa’s Brother

Song Pussy Doe. The other deities are unsure of him and he is the epitome of the 1970s machismo deity. Appears to say the Dark Lord is coming. He torments black people with watermelon and barbecue phallic symbols: pickles and whipped cream. Watermelon is reference to eating pussy. 

Asian Mask Man

An Asian sex deity. In Frank Says they all have an orgy and maybe shows they are all part of an orgy sub-deities  Humping the air is due to the narrator. His sexual perversion is wiggling his chest in the air. 

Feminist Purple Hair Girl

Angry feminist blogger who is turned on by One Direction. The opposite of Frank who is a misogynist psychopath. Upset she has to shave her pubes. 

The Narrator

David Attenborough is a God and could destroy Chin Chin because he controls the story. He can hide Frank’s dildos. He also likes Akon. As an Evil Narrator he controls everything. 

Mr Magic Man

Knew Frank in the Cold War. Ever since they took down the wall. Lemon is his friend and says 21. Brings the meme disease. Mr Magic Man is a War God and was ineffective against the memes unitl Frank called The Base God by eating a piece of paper with #TBYG.

Safari Man

Tries to do Japanese Word of the day and generally a Japanese stereotype. Often teaching words like Hot Dogs. He never quite does his job. 

Mr Negi

Man in a brown lycra suit who grows vegetables. “He’s a root. He doesn’t talk much” He is the worst character in the Filthy Frank world. Just sits there looking at his leek. When someone insults his leek he attacks them. Just cancer.

The Tap Brothers

A couple of identical characters with taps for penises. They attack pink guy and force themselves on top of him. In some reverse gay bashing scene Pink Guy summons Saint Nicolas to finish them off. 

Setting and Lore

Closet

The closet is a portal. Draws souls into Filthy Frank’s life and where these Gods come through to visit him and pulls Salamander Man to the Dark Lord. Even when he says there is nothing special about it Pink Guy is screaming. Safari Man came just to masturbate, black kid is drugged, and Santa’s Brother appears there. People appear from the closet and Frank extracts the chromosomes from demented souls. Many times angry black men come out. 

Chromosomes: transdimensional currency

The first mention of chromosomes was related to missing them due to retardation and Filthy Frank is the expert in Internet Retardation. To make Brownies you need 8000 chromosomes. He retrieves one from souls that arrive in his closet. Then Chromosomes is about time in AD. 2000ch AD Salamander Man is taken. In 8000ch AD, Realm 6.2 Frank can open his closet to find souls to remove their chromosomes to bake a cake. Brownies are 8000 chromosomes. Lord Frank gets hungry and this is food. He often just eats the chromosomes. There is some inconsistencies with this currency. 

Dimensions or Realms

Spice Land, Hell, Pakistan, fake Africa, and Florida. Australia in some newer episodes with collaborations. Maybe most realms are places that are generally hotter.  

Entities: enemies

Websites, memes, boy bands, etc. They are disembodied spirits. Ultimately scared of Gods like Chin Chin or relatives. Entities can do Frank’s bidding. 

Sacrifices:

Performed on the 22nd of December and given to Chin Chin on the 25th. Requires prayer and rituals. Including licking the air and blinking. Frank is able to put them on USB. One sacrifice was pickles, setting an atheist’s fedoras on fire, committing a bloody suicide, shooting someone shitting, nakedness, blood, shiny Pokemon cards, fits, shitty dads, nintendo games, and stabbing dolls. Sacrifices must be done daily. 

Dick Burn’s Filthy Theories:

1.  Deus Ex Machina: Ultimately David Attenborough and Simon Cowell could destroy Chin Chin because he controls the story. Even after Salamander Man is taken by the Dark Lord. Frank begs people to make sacrifices. But then says ‘We need better narrators.’ At the end of  FILTHY FRANK CHIN CHIN SACRIFICE did Attend. Only when Frank becomes a narrator can he control the story. 
2. Youtube Hate: Frank claims by subscribing to the YouTube channel the viewers are trapped for eternity. By watching the channel and making sacrifices the subscribers are appeasing the Dark Lord. Yet, he is only appeased with hate crimes as sacrifices. 
3. Friendly Mythology: Even though the relationship between the Lords, deities, and entities. It is religious. But it is about friendship between them. 
4. Frank is dead. I think imposter Filthy Frank could have killed Filthy Frank. In LOSER READS HATER COMMENTS 5 we see the Imposter reading the Hater comments and the imagery of Pink Guy being summoned by the Frank in heaven. Maybe Filthy Frank is the spiritual embodiment of a suicidal sacrifice to Chin Chin. Since most most realms are places that are generally hotter, maybe in hell Frank lives and in Limbo and we see the same episode show Frank in Hell.   

5. Possible ending. The final battle. The only way to win would be a Hot War (to contrast the Cold War) in a Realm that is hotter in Australia named “Fake Africa”. Filthy Frank would have to summon Lord Chin Chin after mass sacrifices. There will be a massive battle between all the entities and cancerous memes. On the side of Filthy Frank will be be made up of YouTube fans who subscribed as part of their sacrifices. On that day the sub-deities would come in like Lemon Man and Salamander Man who will die with their perversions. I believe the Imposter Frank will chose to fight for the dark Lord and so will Simon Cowell with One Direction. David Attenborough and Simon Cowell die at each other’s hands. From the perversions and the closet and the help of the narrator Future Frank will appear. He will have to fight Feminist Blogger who is a side of himself, the Imposter frank and then Lord Chin Chin the narcissistic side to him. It will be a rap battle in the end where Pink guy will assist. The narrator, the good narrator, possibly Michael from VSauce, will turn Filthy Frank into his future self: “The legendary Fanku-sama.” who must arise to defeat Lord Chin Chin himself on the 25th of December in 2000 CH AD. On that day there will be no more hate crimes, no more eating of souls as chromosomes, and Pink Guy will say something beautiful before he dies in Future Franks arms. Then all the world will do the Harlem Shake to morn the losses and pass into the future cool, realm. 

 

Were suffragettes terrorists?

 Consider the following thought experiment, not a revisionist view of history. The film Suffragette (2015) brought protests in London to the red carpet. Protestors blew smoke and laid down on the carpet. The actresses and screen writers simply smiled and thought this was in the spirit of the film. I agree, suffragettes were a protest movement just as Third Wave Feminists are today. The previous fighting for the vote and the former for nuanced issues such as the pay gap, rape and domestic violence.

After watching the film I wondered an extreme thought. If the suffragettes were here today and used the tactics they employed, would they have been considered a terrorist group? Not the majority of protesters that simply wanted the vote, but the militant wing you see brewing in the trailer  and expressed in the film. To be clear in Britain, suffragists sought to create democratic change in the constitution, and this was overshadowed in the film by the suffragettes that informed the more militant wing of the Women’s Social and Political Union.

Mainstream suffragette Emmeline Pankhurst, one of the only historical characters, played by Meryl Streep, encouraged rebellion. In real life, Union members spat on officers, disrupted democratic meetings, threw rocks, committed acts of suicide, arson, smashed windows, cut telegraph lines, attacked works of art, and attempted to kill democratically elected opponents. My favourite story was one union member, Theresa Garnett, got past a cordoned area of detectives, made her way to Sir Winston Churchill, repeatedly insisted he was a brute, and punched him dead in the face.

In one article on BBC Online a few years ago, entitled Were extreme suffragettes regarded as terrorists? by Melissa Hogenboom who examines this possibility. I did not read this article before having considered the idea, but the article entertains the notion, but eventually dismisses it for a feminist historian’s perspective. This was almost a moment of self-awareness, instead reinforces the party line and says more about the honesty of academia and journalism today. Reminds me of the scene in the trailer were the main character is looking though a window at herself, only to have a suffragette destroy it with rocks. When I read this I do not think they considered the Union’s tactics with our definition of terrorism. Even in the film, the police treat the group as if they were an insidious terrorist cell and in many scenes in the film interrogate the new terrorist initiate. As mentioned earlier, the film and in history, the Union deployed every threat considered terrorism today by MI5:

‘The use or threat of action designed to influence the government or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public, or a section of the public; made for the purposes of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause; and it involves or causes: serious violence against a person; serious damage to a property; a threat to a person’s life; a serious risk to the health and safety of the public; or serious interference with or disruption to an electronic system.’

If we look at the events, the Union escalated further and further destruction and violence. What stopped this? Why did women get the right to vote? Simply speaking: the First World War. Even suffragette leader Emmeline Pankhurst argued there was no point campaigning for the vote if there was no country left to vote in. At the time most men could not vote either, only after the government wanted to help soldiers that fought for Britain was this considered. It was due to the disenfranchisement of men and women serving in the war effort. The Representation of the People Act (1918) removed restrictions for men over 21 years old (19 year olds in the military) and 40% of women over 30 to vote. Even though there were further Acts developed by Parliament that finally got everyone the vote, this was a start to rebuilding the new world. As the Union put its anarchy aside, many were forced to work in factories and were able earn money in a way they had not done in history.

Why is this important? Because we look at movies and feminists in culture today through a fictional window, we see true change comes through democratically passed laws, larger geopolitical change, and technology, not simply the destruction of protest movements. Admittedly, they bring ancillary awareness, but they also blur the issue for people that support protests in the first place. Just like the red carpet protest that argued dead women cannot vote. Even though they meant victims of homicide, many of the woman that helped the war effort, who are dead today, could finally vote and this film shows the violent struggle that the protests miss in their smokey haze. Even the image above with Meryl Streep was considered offensive to Intersectional Feminists despite it being a quote by the suffragist the film was based on Emmeline Pankhurst. But these modern protestors serve the hype surrounding the poor box office release and critically recieved film. In retrospect, the Union’s efforts could’ve gotten worse if it were not for the Great War. The massive scar that dug its way into the world. What was left behind was earning the right to vote for both men and women that fought and died for a country in crisis.

 

When Women Ruled the World…

I’m just about to prepare for my first Indigenous Class. Believe me, I’m progressive enough in the first place to take the course. I want to connect with all cultures, especially Aboriginal cultures. If you look at the image below, it is the first presentation page. I’m interested in matriarchal cultures, if there’s proof they existed, but it’s hard to take my first lecture seriously when it uses the subtitle of a failed FOX program in 2008. The show consisted of 12 women and 12 men sent to a “primitive location” (believe me, that is incredibly insulting given the content of this course) where the men were forced to be subservient to the women. Couldn’t fail right? It never aired in the rest of the world with a very brief broadcast in Finland. I can’t help make a dig at the idea that a matriarchal culture could even exist as a television series.

Back to my lecture, my mind wanders in this workshop environment, this happens when you have that feeling that this course is going to be less academically rigorous and more social justice oriented. In one of the next page’s quote, it says:

“because women’s laws are universal and above all our Yolngu laws”

This quote was in the centre of the page. There was no reference or even a person that said it. We were not even introduced to the Yolngu people in this lecture, nor the readings which I just did. I was a little stumped. The Yolngu people, according to this presentation, is Matriarchal/Patriarchal, especially later in the presentation. I wanted to know more about these fascinating humans. This is why I am here. I think there is this idea that if you wanted to actually know anything about Aboriginal culture you have to do it for yourself. The Yolngu people inhabit north-eastern Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory. Yolngu is a people group, not simply a set of universal laws, in fact the system of Yolngu Law is known as the Maḏayin that governs more than just land rules. Women, more specifically, mothers or daughters are seen as very broad and inclusive term. Children belong to their father’s clan, while their mother belongs to another clan. In the Gove Penninsula and the surrounding area, most Yolngu belong to one of sixteen clans, of which eight are Dhuwa and eight are Yirritja.

As complicated as this seems, I doubt we could impose our ideas of matriarchy and patriarchy on such a nuanced view of the Yolngu people right?

My lecturer could not have been more wrong, and I would even say she was “bloody” wrong, according to The Yolngu and Their Land by Nancy M. Williams, she claims men superordinate rule over most areas of life, and women rule over only what they call “women’s business” which relates to childbirth and menstruation (1986, p. 51) This makes notions of the matriarchal domain of the Yolngu women is a contrast to the title of this lecture. Is it no wonder the first image the lecturer uses to show women rule is a blood red flower?

Clementine Ford & Digital Wave Feminism

How To Become A Professional Australian Feminist

1. Take a gendered issue, make a nude protest and start a change.org petition
2. Wait for comments on Tumblr, Facebook & Twitter to accumulate
3. Appear as a victims on a media outlet (expose accumulation)
4. Start a patreon.com account to swing attention to a new platform

Enter Clementine Ford

In June 2015, a friend asked me about Clementine Ford. I had no idea she appeared on Australia’s The Project. Many Facebook friends were reposting her protest and people were beginning to ask my opinion and at the time I called myself a feminist. She appears to be part of a new wave of feminism, something I was unaware of, something I call Digital Wave Feminism. It repeats the sentiments of Third Wave Feminism, although calling themselves Social Justice Warriors and using social media to network protests.

 Calling herself “Feminist Killjoy To The Stars” and referring to herself as a “boner killer,”

Ford’s Tumblr is a pastiche of exposing misogynist comments and her Twitter account is a mess of retweets to dailylife.com.au on abuse, violence and transgenderism in the media.

The South Australian Hack

During an online attack in June 2015, South Australia, more than 400 women and teenagers and some “allegedly under the age of consent” had their photos stolen and shared on an American revenge porn site. Due to the laws in the United States, the South Australian Police struggled to investigate the problem. Much of the Advertiser’s story was taken up by notable spokeswoman from the Carly Ryan Foundation. This sensitive issue was taken care of by police and professionals, apart from the international issues that still continue. Australia’s #Sunrise’s David Koch couldn’t help himself. “Kochie” claimed the best way to end women being hacked is simply not to take nude pictures. Many voices of his generation say the same thing. This would logically take care of the problem. Kochie’s claim is only one part of the solution: yes, we tell kids not to do it, we also need to create international laws that stop hacked content being shared, and protect people’s content.

Kochie’s Criticism

Many feminists felt Kochie’s comments were blaming the victim. Clementine Ford decides to protest. How does a person protest young women’s privacy being invaded? Upload a nude picture on Facebook. Miss Ford’s photo was shared 21,000 times within 13 hours. The protest was given more traction when Facebook removed the picture due to its community guidelines. Ford was given a 30 day ban. It was too late. Feminists on Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr saw this decision as legitimising Kochie’s claim and a change.org petition was created for her return. Ford used this opportunity to claim Facebook’s double standards. The double standards being banned for standing up for victims when many comments were considered worse.

This was the point where I heard her name for the first time. On her return, she had posted a semi-naked version with the words “Hey #Sunrise get fucked.” A slightly defeated Miss Ford poses with ink reddening the skin upon her chest.

“I expect to live in a world where sexual predators, revenge pornographers and misogynists aren’t defended on morning television shows while their victims are demonised as having made a mistake.”

Even though this does not solve the problem or help stop sharing the images, the problem she claims is the way victims are represented in the media. There was only one way to protest this type of pornography. Make pornography. This protest confuses me. There is a fine line between pornography and making a political stand. I have been told by feminists that the difference is about choice, but this choice is difficult to see in a visual medium.

There is a rule on the internet: “do not feed the trolls” or by reacting to comments you further enrage internet hatred. Ford retweets and posts them on Tumblr, Twitter and Facebook in order to shame commentators. A hub of feminist-interpreted hate-shaming if you will. It becomes about double standards, hateful commenting, and “standing up to speak.” Even if this means sitting down to carve obscenities into your chest about an innocuous morning show. The height of reporting this bathroom incident was Buzzfeed’s report, where the article following the story does not mention the original girls being hacked. This was proof that Ford lost her core message.

Ford on The Project 

The main event. Why was Ford on The Project? Partly Buzzfeed‘s attention and partly the issue of online abuse. She is no longer naked, but wearing a fox jumper, make up and hair flopped to one side. In the pre-recorded story, women are reading offensive opinions due to “speaking out the truth” whatever that is and whoever they are. These are read out loud by women who sit in cars outside the Adelaide High School. Most of the women in the report were not in high school or of “legal age.” Ford’s personal analysis is that 14 to 15 year old boys are particularly cruel. Despite saying she hasn’t named and shamed the boys, she does refer to a particular school, the age group and you can read a letter released by the school. Her modus operandi is shaming horrible commentators. The proof is having actors in the next scene read out cruel, cherrypicked comments whilst voyeuristically waiting outside schools.

Cut to pictures of little girls leaving school, blurred faces, legs walking like overweight stories we see in obesity reports. Claiming girls are especially being bullied despite no evidence. Specific numbers left unquoted. Clementine chokes as she claims the more you speak about it, the more courageous you become. She further claims the “power comes from when women stand together to speak out”. Why is this the case? The problem is being handled by the police, teachers, and a pastoral team as seen in the school’s letter. Naming and shaming perpetrators is the game. Despite the fact that the law was created to defend suspects until they are found guilty through evidence and then fairly punished. Who is the target in this video report? Boys??? She wants to specifically shame 14 and 15 year old boys. This sounds like a joke, but this is the narrative she was creating though the video report. Why didn’t the boys have a voice in this story? Were these boys the commentators, the hackers or the leakers? Was Ford legally allowed to say? It is left unclear as the studio audience applauds the end of the interview.

The Misandry Hour

What’s next after The Project? It’s a trip down the yellow brick road to patreon.com. A podcast called The Misandry Hour. Misandry is the feminist word for women hating men. For me feminism was not about hating men, it used to be about equal rights and a shared egalitarianism. Although Ford’s intention was to create a professionally produced podcast that mocks men. You may think this is an oversimplification, but to quote her directly

‘Like most feminists, I have often been told that I hate men. I’m no longer interested in denying that claim.’

The patreon.com page continues: ‘Do you bathe in a pool of male tears each night before bed?’ Thus actively using male-hatred to fund her podcast. Pledges of $25 or more, she promises to make a person from a Mens Rights Advocacy cry. Despite the fact most MRA’s in Australia are Not-For-Profit Organisations that help men with counselling, depression, financial aid and legal advice. They have no interest in this debate, nor officially making any hateful comments.

Pledging $50 or more, Ford promises you’ll receive a ‘vat of male tears and a giant bucket of fucks you can either give or not give.’

This is the state of affairs for Digital Wave Feminism that outrightly hates men, mocks Not For Profits and uses obscene protests for funding its own media.

After looking into this story, my focus has been looking at the whole story, as biased as this story appears, my hope is that the South Australian Police are able to take down these photos with international pressure, the hackers involved are found and properly punished. I also hope there would be less attention and support for this Moronic Wave Feminism that uses pornography to protest online pedophilia and legitimately hates men. I ask you the specific question, who are the real victims? Women online in general due to double standards? Or specifically the young girls who were targeted by pedophiles who need our protection, support and digital safety?

2016 Update

Since writing this I have lost my interest in this generation of feminism and the way they outrightly turn on men using digital media. I truely considered myself a feminist and now I do not have passion for SJWs. I was fascinated by Anita Sarkeesian who came to this country because she financed a series devoted to sexism in computer games that is generally considered bankrupt by most thinkers. Police have done their best to block these revenge site and Google has successfully tried to ban them as well. The only thing the police were able to do about the Adelaide case was in a sense agree with Kochie and claim the risk is in sending these images in the first place. Sure, I wish more was done for these victims. Also many MRAs on Reddit had reported abuse for the unsuccessful Misandry Hour that has only 6 episodes since September of 2015 to July 6th 2016.

Now, in September 2016, we see Clementine ford is back with a new form of media as I predicted. Not only is she using online abuse as a way to sell her wares with a book called Fight Like A Girl, in an interview with ABC’s Julia Baird claims:

But I don’t give a f*** about men. I’m not trying to change men’s minds, I’m trying to talk to women. I write for women. and I think that’s a beautiful thing to be proud of. I don’t f***ing care what men think about it.

We don’t either Clementine. We don’t either. We are Clementine Bored of you at this stage and the way you expose abuse by men to sell your media that we wouldn’t touch with a ten foot pole. We ex-feminists have more integrity that that.

By October, Miss Clementine Ford decides to get behind a feminist mob to attack a man who ruthlessly attacking women on the confined trams in Melbourne. According to the Daily Mail within hours this post on Facebook attracted 80,000 likes and 10,000 shares:

A man who was publicly shamed online for being a ‘festering turd of a human being’ that ‘intimidated multiple young Asian women’ by waving his hand in their faces on a Melbourne tram

The story focused on this clearly racist that invaded these Asian women’s personal space and demanded the confrontation that this monster demanded. Thanks to Godfrey Elfwick, he was able to record her anger and funnelling the upset from Laura Miller and other feminists that reported their frustrations of abuse on public transport.

Turns out that man was disabled and the man was ‘reportedly autistic and loves to high-five strangers.’ Rather than call the police these women posted these images on Facebook to shame this poor man. The police could have helped this man and reassured these women. Instead, Clementine was part of a mob that poured countless death threats and verbal assaults on this autistic man that reportedly “would not hurt a fly.” What did Clementine do as a member of the press, as a journalist? She delete all her comments and criticism that funnelled anger, hatred, death threats online. Fact.

I wonder what’s expected for November? Maybe shaming men in Movember or what about posts about prostate cancer is linked to male patriarchy. Cannot wait. 

Cherry Picked Footnotes

1. http://www.news.com.au/national/us-website-exploits-hundreds-of-adelaide-women-and-girls-and-refuses-victims-pleas-to-remove-nude-images/story-e6frfkp9-1227400797001
2. http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/feminist-clementine-ford-adds-nude-post-accusing-sunrise-of-being-run-by-a-sexist-parade-of-morons/story-fnpilxz1-1227405419148
3. http://www.buzzfeed.com/lanesainty/a-woman-has-been-banned-from-facebook-after-sharing-the-abus#.xrnZxRZkr
4. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-06-24/adelaide-high-school-students-suspended-violence-women-messages/6570078
5. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-06-24/adelaide-high-school-students-suspended-violence-women-messages/6570078
6. https://www.patreon.com/user?u=800065&ty=h